Search for: "Young v. Phillips et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:03 am
Phillip Alig, et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
FPC American Victory Fund, et al., the Second Amendment Foundation, et al., and the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund provide interpretations of the amendment’s language. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
Gorham et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
In Gorham et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
In Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:50 am
A lawsuit filed last year, Avery v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 7:56 am
USA Gymnastics, Inc., et al., No. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 7:56 am
USA Gymnastics, Inc., et al., No. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Cooper, et al. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
-Phillip M. [read post]
