Search for: "Young v. Smith" Results 161 - 180 of 782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Brigham Young, who took over after the death of Joseph Smith as the church’s leader, may have had as many as 55 wives, a fact among others that resulted in relentless attacks on the religion. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had a news piece “Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case delayed as Fairfax lawyers seek to introduce new evidence”. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:32 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith, Dean of Libraries at the University of Kansas On March 23, 2020, the Supreme Court announced a decision in one of the three copyright cases before it this term, Allen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 11:28 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. of Chicago, 193 So.2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), affirmed, 202 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1967); Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 12:16 am by Tessa Shepperson
Errors in Section 8 Notices There has been a useful case on section 8 notices, Pease v Carter, which solicitor David Smith has written up in this article on LinkedIn. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
” In Smith v Smith, (1987) 12 RFL (3d) 50 (BCSC), the court held that a 20-year-old unemployed high school dropout with aspirations of a career in modelling continued to qualify as a child of the marriage, because of a “somewhat depressed economy. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had an article “David Leyonhjelm appeals against court ruling that he defamed Sarah Hanson-Young”. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith of the Provincial Court of British Columbia dated September 26, 2016. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Calcagni * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]