Search for: "Young v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2013, 7:12 am
Below is a letter from the lawyer for Jaasi Munaka, one of the young lawyers discussed in the Maples v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
Cromer Young (Thomas Jefferson School of Law) has posted "Centering the Pleading Pendulum After Iqbal" on SSRN. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:33 am
In Young v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:00 am
In Young v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:17 am
As he did during the trial in Capitol v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:33 am
On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Young v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:10 pm
Per Justice Scalia’s majority opinion (joined by Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor), the case “consider[s] whether Ex parte Young, 209 U. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:59 pm
Thomas School of Law. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Young (Duke University School of Law) has posted State Sovereign Immunity After the Revolution on SSRN. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
Thomas Lee graduated from Brigham Young University and the University of Chicago Law School and went on to two clerkships: the first for Judge J. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:59 pm
Young). [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 3:09 pm
The ambiguous science does not really support the constitutional mandates that Steinberg supported either, as I explained in vain in CJLF's brief in Graham v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:49 pm
After all, Justices Scalia and Thomas have repeatedly written in favor of the traditional understanding of Ex parte Young, and, of the current Justices, only Justice Kennedy seems more positively disposed toward Judge Wilkinson's approach.All of this is a long way of saying that I suspect there will be some fun and serious heavy lifting later this year on the continuing meaning, relevance, and force of Ex parte Young. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 pm
Miller III, who is the son of Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:22 pm
Writing in this week's Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:24 am
In a series of separate opinions, Justice Thomas has adopted this approach and rejected the contemporary notion of “purposes and objects” preemption. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In Morris v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
United Haulers v. [read post]
