Search for: "Young v. U. S" Results 141 - 160 of 548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 8:26 pm by Postali
Police established a fictitious person with a complete online profile who was reportedly the woman’s friend who had two young daughters. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am by Eric Goldman
” Upon her response of “ok,” Anderson sent the message: “When you arrived I wanted to do u,” and this emoji: United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Papers on SSRN with American Indian law subjects, either unpublished or recently published: Agency Pragmatism in Addressing Law’s Failure: The Curious Case of Federal ‘Deemed Approvals’ of Tribal-State Gaming Compacts 52 U. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm by Nassiri Law
Although the Kenney case dealt specifically with wage-and-hour law violations by cannabis companies, it’s possible that the case of Denning v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by SHG
While free speech isn’t shed at the school yard gates, as the Supreme Court held in Tinker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm by Marty Lederman
  Here's the transcript of argument in Nos. 17-1618 and 17-1623, Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am by becassidy
It’s the first Monday in October, which means the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Was there an independent cause of action–separate from the allegation of ultra vires governmental action–in cases like Ex Parte Young (1908), Larson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Just as no history exists of "any private prosecution of federal crimes" in the United States, Young v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Considering the legal marijuana industry is relatively young, it’s not surprising that there are few coverage decisions. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
While Eichmann’s trial was according to the rule of law, his capture was criticized, in Argentina at least, “as a violation of of that country’s sovereignty and of international law“. [read post]