Search for: "Young v. Woodward" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
A couple of young people come by and stand near me, chatting; I later learn they are interns for NBC, assigned to get into any line that may form near the entrance—and stay there. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The result was that Ontario law was applied to this analysis.[11] On the question of unconscionability the Supreme Court followed its prior guidance that “arguments over any potential unfairness resulting from the enforcement of arbitration clauses contained in standard form contracts are better dealt with directly through the doctrine of unconscionability”.[12] The Supreme Court described the doctrine as follows:[13] Unconscionability is an equitable doctrine that is used to set aside… [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:50 am by Gail Heriot
Today is the 122st anniversary of the decision in Plessy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
  This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972,  Taylor v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
*Breaker Morant (Australia, 1980)  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080310/  http://www.amazon.com/Breaker-Morant-Edward-Woodward/dp/B000X73NCM/ref=sr_1_1? [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972,  Taylor v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Young, 13-95 (whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Meanwhile, possible relist Woodward v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Answer: I stress in the book that the Roberts Court is still a “young” Court in some ways. [read post]