Search for: "Younge v Patel"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
Among those Axios reported to be under discussion for senior government posts are Stephen Miller, Kash Patel, Steve Bannon, and Jeffrey Clark, who is currently under indictment in Georgia for his role in the fake electors scheme and a co-conspirator in the federal election indictment. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
The Fox Williams authors are Andrew Hill, Partner; Anisha Patel, Senior Associate; and Sam Tarrant and Olwen Mair, Associates. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 4:42 am
Justice Barrett wrote for the Court in Patel v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
However, both tiers of the tribunal dismissed Mr Patel’s appeal. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Rather than adults’ rights, two very young British children’s rights hung in the balance. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:50 pm
Tilikum was first captured off the coast of Iceland as a young two-year old in 1983. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On 8 July 2016, Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Unnadkat v Patel. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 3:46 am
” At Gibbons IP Law Alert, Samuel Megerditchian and Ankit Patel discuss the Court’s recent grant in Halo Electronics v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Patel, 5-4 , June 22, 2015. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:45 pm
Municipal Court and See v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Tomorrow the Court will hear oral arguments in King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Ernst & Young, LLP, 13-1274, a Ninth Circuit case asking whether a party must show prejudice after its opponent waived its contractual right to arbitrate by participating in litigation for such waiver to be binding. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Ernst & Young, LLP, 13-1274, stems from a suit against the respondent for allegedly violating California labor laws. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Khan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: from @GOOD: "Want to Raise Young Leaders? [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:18 am
On appeal, in Barnhard v. [read post]
