Search for: "Younger v. Harris"
Results 21 - 40
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
The district court dismissed the president’s complaint, declining to exercise jurisdiction over the suit under Younger v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:53 am
The district court dismissed the case, relying on a Supreme Court decision, Younger v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:48 am
The district court dismissed the case, relying on a Supreme Court decision, Younger v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
While dismissing the complaint pursuant to Younger v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
The district court declined to exercise jurisdiction and dismissed the case under the doctrine of Younger v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
Tokyo lastly argued the District Court erred in its decision to abstain under the doctrine established in Younger v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
Harris was misapplied by the lower court. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:09 am
On October 7, 2019, a federal district court rejected an injunction request from Trump’s attorneys, citing that it could abstain under a prior court ruling, Younger v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
Dow Jr. wrote in an Oct. 9 memo in Timber Hill LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
In Minor v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:00 am
Brennan, Jr. authored a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Thurgood Marshall and Harry Blackmun. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Harry Truman picked Harold Burton, a Republican, along with three centrists to the court who didn’t reflect the growing liberalism of the Democratic Party. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971); Burford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
with this passage from Younger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
with this passage from Younger v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:03 pm
If a Republican dominated Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
