Search for: "ZTE Corporation"
Results 101 - 120
of 224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Ruth Soetendorp reviews Intellectual Property, Finance and Corporate Governance, by Janice Denoncourt. [read post]
22 May 2019, 11:16 am
The ZTE case demonstrated clearly how having U.S. components in Chinese telecommunications equipment can prove a powerful tool for enforcement and negotiation, a tool we are already in danger of losing because of the reaction to the ZTE incident. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 pm
House of Representatives and the FCC, and is the author of Doing Good: The New Rules of Corporate Responsibility. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:08 pm
Image from PopSugarI’ve had a front row seat to China for well over a decade. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm
… could raise eyebrows in corporate America, since they would likely be on the receiving end of those countermeasures”—countermeasures that the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
It observes that the prohibition is irrevocable, which is unique to Huawei and one other company (ZTE Corporation, which Trump controversially rescued from a Commerce Department punishment last year). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:46 am
China-based telecoms giant Huawei Technologies (5.405 published PCT applications) was the top corporate filer in 2018, followed by Mitsubishi (2.812), Intel (2.499), Qualcomm (2.404) and ZTE (2.080). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:25 am
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Aligning Emerging Global Strategies to Combat Corporate Corruption," The International Lawyer 52(1)1-45 (2019). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
Ltd, ZTE Corporation and Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 38. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Justice policy on coordinated resolutions in corporate penalties. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Justice policy on coordinated resolutions in corporate penalties. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:10 am
If the White House issues such an order, it would likely pose a particular burden for rural networks which rely on Huawei and ZTE equipment due to its lower price. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 5:10 am
However, the state-owned and -subsidized Chinese company CRRC Corporation Ltd. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:18 pm
In other words, there is nothing illegitimate about the U.S. seeking to punish bank fraud against its own corporations and nationals under U.S. or international law. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 8:06 am
The export prohibition covers corporations and corporate officers who have reason to know the export is intended for Iran. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
This comes after the heads of six U.S. intelligence agencies recommended, during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing in February 2018, private citizens not use products or services from Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:29 am
In the case of ZTE, the Commerce Department imposed an export ban following ZTE’s violation of a settlement order regarding sanctions evasion. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm
Probation was originally imposed after ZTE pled guilty in March 2017 to evading U.S. sanctions against Iran. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:39 pm
” Covered investments are those that provide corporate control, any position on the board of directors, a role in sensitive decision-making, or access to “material non-pu [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:20 am
Add to this a confusing back-and-forth between the Commerce Department, the president and Congress over whether to follow through on a law-enforcement penalty that would have effectively put Chinese telecom giant ZTE Corporation out of business, and the net result is a stew of concern without clarity about how to protect U.S. national security and economic welfare—two interests that are increasingly indistinguishable. [read post]
