Search for: "Zabel v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Brill, P.C., 25 AD3d 420, [1st Dept 2006]; Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500,501 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:18 pm
City of Wichita v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm
Learn more about the case:https://www.aclu.org/cases/bert-v-oconnor Stay informed about our workSign up [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Zabell, Professor of Statistics and Mathematics, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University Joe S. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Goldstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Tags: Beneficial owners, Corporate Transparency Act, Disclosure, Financial regulation, FinCEN, LLCs, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Transparency When a Company Takes a Stand, What is the Board’s Role? [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:53 am
Dern, 289 U.S. 352 (1933), Zabel v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:05 am
Judge Edmead explains: “The lack of an attorney-client relationship bars a legal malpractice claim (Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 AD3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
” Matter of Goldstein v Zabel, 146 AD3d 624, 631 (1st Dept 2017). [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Frase, Richard S. and Julian V. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]
