Search for: "Zabel v. State"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Goldstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Tags: Beneficial owners, Corporate Transparency Act, Disclosure, Financial regulation, FinCEN, LLCs, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Transparency When a Company Takes a Stand, What is the Board’s Role? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
United Kingdom and Al-Skeini v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Eaton (Oklahoma State University), and Bradley S. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:58 am
The magistrate also recommended denying summary judgment on the issues of punitive damages and backpay (Zabell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:18 pm
City of Wichita v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Zabell, Professor of Statistics and Mathematics, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University Joe S. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
