Search for: "Zale v. Zale"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 5:53 pm
Zale Corp. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The court found that the Zale-Signet merger was approved by a majority of disinterested stockholders in a fully informed vote, but despite this, Chancellor Parsons said “I declined to follow this Court’s holding in that case because I interpreted the Supreme Court’s decision in Gantler v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:40 am
The Delaware Chancery Daily reports that the plaintiff’s in Zale have appealed the Court Chancery’s dismissal (on reconsideration following the Delaware Supreme Court’s opinion in Corwin v KKR) of their aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty claims against a financial advisor in In re Zale. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 6:34 am
On October 2, 2015, the Delaware Supreme Court decided Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:05 am
In so holding, the Court reaffirmed its holding in Corwin v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:30 pm
Class Certified in Infant Formula Advertising CaseThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.A class was certified by the federal district court in Ft. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:33 am
The allegations of fraud were pleaded with the particularity required to pass muster under Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court determined.The November 22 opinion in Englehardt v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
The January 20 decision in Trusted Integration, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:56 pm
”Commercial Speech v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:31 am
Class Litigation v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:49 am
” This reflected the legislature's intent that the FAL should provide extraterritorial protection from false claims made in California, the court noted.The opinion in Schlesinger v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:34 am
The decision in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:53 pm
Consumer Can Pursue Claim That “Greenlist” Label Was MisleadingThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.A class action complaint alleging that a “Greenlist” label used by household cleaning products manufacturer S.C. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:47 am
The April 27 opinion in Kremers v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
The allegations of ascertainable loss were unsupported conclusory statements insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss, the court determined.The purchaser’s claims were dismissed without prejudice because it was conceivable that she could plead ascertainable loss with specificity, the court said.The opinion in Lieberson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:14 pm
The purchaser alleged that every member of the class must have seen and relied on Buy.com's negligent misrepresentations that the rebate was available.The decision is Kershenbaum v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:22 am
The decision is Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:38 pm
The opinion in Delaney v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:02 am
The control that Tien Tsin was able to exercise because of trademark ownership, stock ownership, and near sole supplier status did not rise to the level of total domination that could justify holding it liable for torts committed by a separately incorporated entity, the court concluded.The decision is Campagnolo S.R.L. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:50 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
