Search for: "Zambrano v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
Sweitzer Professor of Law; Todd Venook, a fellow at the Rhode Center; and Diego Zambrano, associate professor of law. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Zambrano, Missing Discovery in Lawyerless Courts, 122 Colum. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court held in Lujan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
(As Tyler observes, I sometimes describe controversies as based on state law, as they often are today. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
(Although, in Tutun v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:03 am
First, it is time to reconsider the act of state doctrine. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:02 am
" In Rasoulzadeh v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:01 am
As I discussed yesterday, the Supreme Court reaffirmed these principles in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 12:40 pm
In Banco Nacional de Cuba v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:46 am
In S v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-304/14) (“CS”), it held that “in exceptional circumstances a member state may adopt an expulsion measure…”. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am
These appeals consider the scope of the Zambrano principle which states that a non-member state national parent of a EU citizen child resident within the EU is entitled to reside in the EU. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 2028 These appeals raised common issues regarding the scope of the Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (Case C-34/09) [2012] QB 265 (“Zambrano”) principle which states that a non-member state national (“TCN”) parent of a European Union citizen child resident within the EU is entitled to reside in the EU. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Hence Irwin LJ found that the “underlying principle in Zambrano is undisturbed by Chavez-Vilchez” and in the latter case the referring court was looking for guidance in circumstances where a child was dependent on one non-EU parent with no right of residence; circumstances in which the state must ensure a careful process of enquiry. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Equally, the misconception was exposed by the fact that the tremors caused by the Zambrano judgment resulted in the amendment of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 in order to give Zambrano carers the right to live and work in the UK. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
However, art 51 limits the CFR’s application to “only when” member states “are implementing Union Law”. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 2:28 am
In Zambrano the CJEU held that an EU member state could not take measures in respect of a non-EU citizen who was the primary carer (a “Zambrano carer”) of an EU citizen, where those measures effectively deprived that dependent EU citizen of the genuine enjoyment of his or her rights under EU law. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Tessili v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
The Secretary of State had complied with the PSED because all that the Regulations did was to return the entitlement of Zambrano carers to benefits to what it had been before the CJEU judgment triggering the right to reside, and therefore the Regulations did not cause a change in policy. [read post]
