Search for: "Zelman v Zelman" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm by Frank Ravitch
My piece for the symposium focused on the problems Trinity Lutheran might raise given the court’s 2002 decision in Zelman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Hillary Byrnes
Blaine Amendments have stymied efforts in many states to create or expand voucher and scholarship programs that would allow parents to make the best choice for their children’s education, even though the court decided in Zelman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am by Mark Rienzi
Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter recounted this history in their dissenting opinion in Zelman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am by Rick Garnett
Or, will there be hints from the Democratic appointees that Zelman – like, many liberal academics and observers hope, Heller v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:37 am by Rick Garnett
However, given the votes of Justices Breyer and Ginsburg in Locke v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:03 pm by Rick Garnett
Perry concurrence, “to avoid that divisiveness based upon religion that promotes social conflict, sapping the strength of government and religion alike” and – in his Zelman v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
Perry concurrence, “to avoid that divisiveness based upon religion that promotes social conflict, sapping the strength of government and religion alike” and – in his Zelman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:07 am
This system, combining inmate choice with strict government neutrality as between secular and religious providers, is consistent with the Establishment Clause for the same reasons that school choice plans are constitutional, as explained in Zelman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am by Charles Szafir
Grover, 166 Wis.2d 501 (1992) (The voucher program satisfies the criteria of public money going to private entities and pursuing a public benefit); Zelman v. [read post]