Search for: "Ziegelheim v. Apollo" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The party to a settlement, who asserts a negligence claim against his former attorney, must establish the departure from the standard of care by specific facts
11 Aug 2010, 9:01 am by PaulKostro
Apollo, 128 N.J. 250 (1992), and Puder v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
There is no absolute bar to a claim of malpractice if a former client enters into a settlement with regard to the underlying action before obtaining a decision with respect to the complained-of conduct of the attorney
17 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm by PaulKostro
Puder represented a limited equity-based exception to Ziegelheim’s general rule [Ziegelheim v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
When is a Case Really Settled?
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
  Ziegelheim v. [read post]
New Jersey Attorney Law Review Blog - http://newjerseylawreview.blogspot.com/
Guido v. Duane Morris: Potential Setback For Mediation?
22 Jan 2010, 6:33 am by Richard J. Webb
Apollo, 128 N.J. 250 (1992) and Pruder v. [read post]
Healthcare Neutral ADR Blog - http://www.healthcareneutraladrblog.com/
When a client alleges that he entered into a settlement based on negligent advice from his lawyers, he need not first seek to vacate the settlement, but may proceed directly against those lawyers the plaintiff asserts provided the negligent advice that cu
3 Jun 2010, 8:34 am by PaulKostro
Apollo, 128 N.J. 250 (1992). [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A plaintiff need not seek relief from a settlement prior to seeking relief against an attorney
25 Aug 2010, 10:39 am by PaulKostro
Duane Morris, LLP., 200 N.J. 79 (2010), the court explained that Ziegelheim v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
New Jersey Law Journal: News Briefs July 16, 2009
16 Jul 2009, 1:15 am
Buechel, 183 N.J. 428 (2005), together with an earlier ruling, Ziegelheim v. [read post]
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library - http://crimlawlib.blogspot.com/
The doctrine of collateral estoppel bars relitigation of an issue that was determined in a prior action, generally between the same parties, involving a different cause of action
23 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by PaulKostro
Ziegelheim v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Judicial Estoppel in Legal Malpractice
17 Jan 2008, 3:43 am
" Ziegelheim v. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Overriding and Abiding Conflicts of Interest
28 Sep 2011, 2:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See Ziegelheim v. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated Persons S.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18)
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
Wills and Estate Administration Articles - http://njwills.blogspot.com/