Search for: "Zipper v. Zipper"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
The fact that it is Christmas makes a discussion, however brief, of Rubies Costume Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:06 am
Theresa Barr (former ADO) won in State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:45 am
That is because of a Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am
Hall v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In his recent September 30, 2014 decision in the case of Rochow v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:22 am
Others who have seen the exhibit say the five-foot-long working zipper with wooden teeth rivals the Moog. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 7:31 am
. - sure it’s a bit of a security risk, but it’s unbelievably handy v. having to reach down, using two hands to unzip a compartment The best layout of various little internal pouches, zippered mesh gadget holders, routing for iPod headset cables and AC power cables - best compartmentalization I’ve ever seen A QuickZip compartment that provides a larger access panel (zippered) to get to the internal compartments for pens, cards, etc. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
(See Du Pont v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:53 pm
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Montana Camo, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:00 pm
(Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:00 pm
(Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
How can you not admire a country that has given us Joni Mitchell, Bobby Orr, and Pamela Anderson, as well as the inventors of the zipper, basketball, and Trivial Pursuit? [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:58 pm
A NSW judge has considered the defamatory potential of the zipper mouth emoji. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
Patent No. 6,979,482 entitled MULTIWALL BAG WITH ZIPPER AND FIN and owned by General Electric Capital. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
Patent No. 6,979,482 entitled MULTIWALL BAG WITH ZIPPER AND FIN and owned by General Electric Capital. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:23 am
Houda, an Australian case that said the zipper-mouth emoji, by itself, could constitute a defamatory statement. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:48 pm
Silipo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:15 am
The Rule v. [read post]
