Search for: "Zito v. Zito" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2020, 8:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
Accordingly, the court granted the Commission’s motion to dismiss Zito v North Carolina Coastal Commission, 2020 WL 1493476 (ED NC 3/27/2020) [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Take Matneja v Zito  2018 NY Slip Op 05298  Decided on July 18, 2018  Appellate Division, Second Department as an example. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:42 am by Glenn Reynolds
SALENA ZITO: Battleground States Of Resentment: “Whether it is called General Lee Highway, as in Virginia, or Molly Pitcher Highway, as in Pennsylvania, the lives and economic strain along U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here is a short, pungent and dispositive decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Zito v Fischbein Badillo Wagner Harding ; 2011 NY Slip Op 00285 ; Decided on January 20, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here is a short, pungent and dispositive decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Zito v Fischbein Badillo Wagner Harding  ; 2011 NY Slip Op 00285 ; Decided on January 20, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:51 am
The Union's duty of fair representationUFT Local 2 v NYC Board of Education, 34 PERB 4553 John Zito, a New York City teacher, was served with a notice of discipline pursuant to Section 3020-a of the Education Law while he was on an “extended sick leave” of absence without pay. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 11:04 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Zito of the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Xander v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
DeSantis v Zito  ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31059(U)  ; April 24, 2011;  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109753/09;  Judge: Joan B. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:35 pm by Andrew Raff
" The complaint: Zito v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:53 am
  In REVERSING the order allowing Wilson Elser to withdraw as defense counsel, the Second Department reiterated New York's long-standing rule: The motion of Wilson Elser was a "poor vehicle" to test the propriety of the disclaimer of coverage and withdrawal of defense by James River (Brothers v Burt, 27 NY2d 905, 906; see Seye v Sibbio, 33 AD3d 608; Garcia v Zito, 242 AD2d 258; Pryer v DeMatteis Orgs., 259 AD2d 476). [read post]