Search for: "Zivotofsky v. Kerry"
Results 21 - 40
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 4:00 am
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court has acknowledged, most recently in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
” And most recently, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
See Texas v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
For example, Blackman argues that the president’s exclusive recognition power as described by the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In Part I of this series, I concluded that the “president cannot obstruct justice when he exercises his lawful authority that is vested by Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
” In contrast, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
As Justice Kennedy wrote in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:27 am
Kerry,” the statement argued. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:26 am
Kerry. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
As explained by the district court in Nader v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:04 am
Kerry and NFIB v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 10:24 am
Kerry (2015). [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
This category seeks to address the facts at issue in Kerry v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 5:33 pm
., 2015) (West Academic Press, Publisher) (reprinted in 17 Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 777 (2016)); Reflections on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm
Kerry). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:10 am
Supreme Court confirmed that Congress cannot restrict this power in the 2015 decision Zivotofsky v. [read post]
