Search for: "Zoning Board of Appeals v. Freedom of Information Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 7:43 am by Patricia Salkin
Handsome, Inc. v Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Monroe, 2015 WL 4130360 (CT. 7/14/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Calvert Tract submitted a zoning application to the Prince George’s Planning Board of the Maryland–National Capital Park and Planning Commission seeking to use its 36 acre property for a mixed-use town center. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:57 am
”Facts:  A developer submitted a zoning application to the Prince George’s Planning Board of Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the “Commission”) to develop a certain tract of land for a mixed-use town center. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:58 am by Daniel Richardson
  The first is to analogize Exemption 24 to Exemption 5 under the federal Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
During the pendency of Defendant's zone change appeal and upon receipt of Judge Owens's decision, the Commission approved the special exception permit but took no official action regarding the zone change application. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court of appeals ruled that the condemnation could proceed based only upon the zoning of the condemnor’s property. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Information from past webinars is available in the webinar archive. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
They argued that the mandate exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause and substantially burdened appellants' religious exercise, in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Tom Crone, the former News of the World lawyer, has appeared before a Bar Standards Board disciplinary tribunal. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, et al., 796 F.3d 18 (D.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
KG v OHIM (IPKat) AG supports AB InBev’s case in BUD appeal: Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
Not only would the WMA abolish covenants not to compete nationwide, outside of the extremely narrow exceptions highlighted above, but it would also provide the Department of Labor (DOL) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with broad enforcement power. [read post]