Search for: "Zuckerman v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of these triable issues of fact, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor do they qualify as an admission absent evidence that the employees were authorized to speak on CSI's behalf (see Gstalder v State of New York, 240 AD2d 541, 542 [1997]; Vozdik v Frederick, 146 AD2d 898, 900 [1989]). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zpfcer (Elkan Abramowitz, Barry Bohrer) Reports and Resources Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal and Private Sector (PDF) 1.usa.gov/yzxOby (Homeland Security) comScore Releases February 2012 U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Co. of Midwest v Casella, 278 AD2d 417, 418, lv denied 96 NY2d 710; Walburn v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:25 pm by Rich
Co. of Am., 906 F.2d 1525, 1526 (11th Cir.1990).Zuckerman v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:28 pm by admin
Zuckerman stated that SOX was turning into a “robust remedy for whistleblowers,” pointing to the ARB’s decisions in Sylvester and Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:37 am by admin
 The article quotes Jason Zuckerman, a principal attorney at The Employment Law Group® law firm, stating that the broad reading of the SOX whistleblower provisions was just what Congress intended: “Some federal judges and ALJs ignored the plain meaning of the statute and held that protected conduct is limited solely to disclosures concerning shareholder fraud,” Zuckerman said. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm by admin
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]