Search for: "admin"
Results 481 - 500
of 5,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 8:58 am
No. 82954; Admin. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:24 am
No.10578; Admin. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:14 am
No. 4012; Admin. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:21 am
Act Rel,. 4895; Admin. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
No. 5224 Admin. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
No. 4848; Admin. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:12 am
Rulings Release No. 6442; Admin. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
Your sys admin probably doesn't want a hug from you anyway. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:06 am
There seems to be no reason in principle why not but R (Smith) v Land Registry (Peterborough) [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin) â€â [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:38 am
On appeal from: [2010] EWHC 2225 (Admin) The appellants had both been acquitted of previous charges, though after their arrest the police had taken DNA and fingerprint samples. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:57 am
Using employer’s computer to store sexually explicit files results in recommendation the employee be terminated Human Resources Admin. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:58 am
In re an application by the General Dental Council (Savery and others, interested parties):[2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 332 “The General Dental Council was under no obligation to obtain an order of the court for permission to use and disclose dental records of patients for the purposes of investigating allegations of professional misconduct against a registered dentist even where the patients in question objected to the disclosure or did not… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
Regina (King) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2522 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 258 “The discretion of a prison governor to decide the extent of an inmate’s basic association with his fellows did not remove from association its quality as a personal right, a right which was subject to the lawful exercise of discretion by the governor. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Information Commissioner [2011] EWHC 44 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 19 “In estimating whether the cost of complying with a request for information would exceed the appropriate limit for the purposes of claiming exemption from the obligation to comply in reliance on section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, a public authority was not permitted by regulation 4 of the Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees)… [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:33 am
Cardiff Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 1846 (Admin) “Where a district judge had decided a preliminary issue as to jurisdiction his ruling could properly be challenged by way of case stated or judicial review. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
Regina (Patel) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 240 “An applicant for exceptional funding by way of legal aid had to meet a high threshold to satisfy the test of ‘significant wider public interest’ in para 27.2.8 of the Legal Services Commission’s Funding Code Decision Making Guidance, subject to the latitude (or margin of discretion) accorded to the Lord Chancellor in the exercise of his judgment. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am
Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2010] EWHC 143 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 38 “Where the construction of an house without planning permission had been concealed by the erection of straw bales and a tarpaulin which had been left in place for over four years after the completion of the house, so that the local planning authority did not become aware of the house until after expiry of that four-year period, the totality of building operations… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 137 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 24 ”When deciding whether to make an award of damages, under art 5(5) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for a breach of art 5(4) of the Convention it was necessary to have regard to the provisions of s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the restrictions placed on such awards. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:03 am
Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2012] EWHC 296 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 37 “In order to found a conviction for an offence under regulation 44(1)(d) of the Food Labelling Regulations 1996, a prosecuting authority was required to prove, to the criminal standard: (i) that the food, at the point that it was ready for delivery to the ultimate consumer or caterer, was ‘highly perishable’ and so required then and thereafter to be labelled with a ‘use… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:32 am
R (Huitson) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 11 ”It was within the permissible area of discretionary judgment of Parliament, and compatible with art 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to legislate with retrospective effect to prevent taxpayers from seeking to use, by wholly artificial arrangements, a Double Tax Arrangement such as existed between the United Kingdom and the Isle of… [read post]
