Search for: "ex parte Larkins" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am by Sasha Volokh
  Private status might be correlated with some relevant factors, but it generally isn't part of the actual test. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
Here are three recent likelihood of confusion cases: one opposition and two ex parte appeals. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal After Texas Shooting, Republicans Face Online Anger Over NRA Money MSN – Timothy Bella (Washington Post) | Published: 5/25/2022 While some Republicans in Congress offered their thoughts and prayers to the families of the victims of the shooting in Uvalde, Texas, critics have been quick to point out the millions of dollars that GOP lawmakers have taken from the National Rifle Association (NRA) in contributions over the years. [read post]
24 May 2022, 3:25 am
Applicant argued that the online evidence is hearsay, but the Board pointed out that the Federal Rules of Evidence (which define hearsay and govern when it is and is not admissible at a hearing or trial) “do not apply in ex parte appeals. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
City of Richmond, 226 U.S. 137, 143–44 (1912); see also Washington ex rel. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:45 am
These lectures were part of a community-wide effort in Harlem to learn and value the history of African Americans and their contribution to American history. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:40 am
The Board was unimpressed.The Board pointed out that these arguments for the most part are not available in ex parte cases. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:58 am
First, it was an ex parte case, and the Board found no prior ruling in which Strategic Partners was applied in an inter partes context. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Law provides no protection for an attorney whose sociopathic ex-husband plans to murder her. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
I always hate to say how the argument went, in part because what people really want to know is, “who will win? [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Notwithstanding a quintet of relists since receiving the record, the Court denied cert. without comment in Larkin v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Here’s the first part of ELSSCAP’s amicus brief on my behalf: I. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Larkin III, Esq., of Larkin, Axelrod, Ingrassia & Tetenbaum, LLP, of Newburgh, N.Y. represented the father; Terry D. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am by interns
(As Larkin and I previewed the argument in some detail, I’ll assume reader familiarity with the key issues in play.) [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm by christopherbrown
Yet, while the Court of Appeals held that direct application of an amended guideline to conduct that occurred prior to the amendment offends the ex post facto clause, “analogizing” to the amendment does not.Fourth, the Court of Appeals held that Larkin’s sentence was reasonable. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Many lessons can be learned from this case, namely that a judge should not overly rely on the committees’ proposal of attorneys’ fees, ex parte hearings should not be held, supportive data on the distribution plan should be required, and sealing attorneys’ fee documents is a Big No-No. [read post]