Search for: "i-Design BV" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  This design is subject to a Registered Community Design (RCD), unregistered UK design right and, now thanks to Brexit, a UK registered design (No 9002954222-00001). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
This international application filed under the PCT [hereinafter referred to as "international application" or "subsequent application"], for which the EPO acted as designated Office, had been filed in the name of Tenaris Connections AG as applicant for all designated states except the United States of America and of five natural persons as applicants for the United States of America on 6 September 2003. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:43 am
Then I remembered, most trade marks are registrable as Community designs too! [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  This was the first dilemma faced, over time, by the well-known designer Christian Louboutin in the process of enforcing the rights in his red sole trade mark. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by Ben Freeman
In this post, I highlight three pieces of draft legislation designed to ensure Congress does just that. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 9:42 am
Using that test, then, I ask you: Would you be likely to confuse a $30 pair of rubber shoes with a $50,000 sports car? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
The application for cancellation came from Halder Holdings BV (now Gimv Nederland BV), pleading earlier use of earlier registered and unregistered marks consisting of Halder, Halder Holdings, Halder Investments and Halder Interest. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am by Sara Parrello
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIn law, perhaps one of the most famous aphorisms is “I know it when I see it”, which Justice Potter Stewart used to describe his threshold test for obscenity (in Jacobellis v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
  The CJEU held in Case C-322/10 Medeva BV v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2011] ECR I-12051 that it was necessary for the product to be "specified" or "identified" in the wording of the claims. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 9:46 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
On 1 February 2016, the Communist Party Central Political-Legal Committee designated her case as one of seven typical cases of leadership interference in the judicial process. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:55 am
The launch is designed to coincide with World Environment Day (tomorrow). [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV, at 17; Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma at 18-19). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Examining Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD [2015] C-681/13) James drew attention to the CJEU’s strict approach to countries refusing to enforce judgments from another Member State on the grounds of public policy. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:48 am by Laura Morelli
The French Supreme Court noted that, under its prior case law, it had interpreted these two provisions as creating a due cause exception where (i) the defendant merely exports the goods to a country in which they are sold legally, and (ii) if there is no risk that they could be marketed in France (French Supreme Court 10 July 2007, Buttress BV vs. [read post]