Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 1 - 20 of 1,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2017, 10:33 am by Walter Olson
In the settlement of the class action Kumar v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:51 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Increased sentence In 2005, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, Oliver Mills, appellant, was convicted of second-degree rape, third-degree sexual offense, sexual abuse of a minor, and second-degree assault. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 3:20 pm
There was an interesting NFP reversal today: Oliver v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
Here is the abstract:With the Ninth Circuit's opinion in al-Kidd v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:11 am by Ted Frank
David Oliver has lots of good questions about the nonsensical Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Carolyn Wright
The question is currently before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Allen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Carolyn Wright
The question is currently before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Allen v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:05 am by sally
‘In this series of case studies Oliver Saxby QC analyses three very substantial historical sex abuse trials in which he was involved over the last 12 months, each of which ended with successful outcomes: R v Bodnar and others at Canterbury Crown Court, in which he led for the defence; R v Singh and others at the Central Criminal Court, in which he led for the Crown; and R v Carragher and others at Leeds Crown Court, in which he led for the defence. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:22 am by Christine Corcos
This essay, written for a forthcoming Oxford University Press volume edited by Geoffrey Stone and Lee Bollinger, probes Oliver Wendell Holmes’s almost offhand statement in Frohwerk v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:22 am
This essay, written for a forthcoming Oxford University Press volume edited by Geoffrey Stone and Lee Bollinger, probes Oliver Wendell Holmes’s almost offhand statement in Frohwerk v. [read post]