Search for: "v. Atkins" Results 41 - 60 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2013, 7:50 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Florida: Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:27 am by Dominic Yobbi
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday over how to apply the court's 2002 decision Atkins v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:44 am by Federalist Society
The question in the case is whether the Florida scheme for identifying intellectually disabled defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Florida: Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
Florida, the Court will decide "whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 6:06 am
Thanks to Michael Atkins at The Seatle Trademark Lawyer for pointing out K and N Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:35 am
Michael Atkins provides a detailed report here at his Seattle Trademark Lawyer blog, on the oral argument held Friday, February 23rd in the Hormel Foods Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:43 pm
It's unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation, the Court said in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mitchell, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1899 (08 September 2009) Burns, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1907 (03 September 2009) Truong, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1910 (01 September 2009) Atkins & Anor v R [2009] EWCA Crim 1876 (02 October 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Phillips & Anor v McGregor-Paterson [2009] EWHC 2385 (Ch) (02 [...] [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 7:42 am
In an interesting 5-2 decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]