Search for: "v. Davis" Results 21 - 40 of 8,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2008, 8:54 am
R v Hills; R v Davies; R v Pomfret; [2008] WLR (D) 251 There was no practical reason why an order should not be made requiring an offender to serve an additional period of imprisonment other than the minimum period before being considered for parole where there had been a planned, deliberate and serious act of violence, in circumstances which fully justified a significant sentence of imprisonment. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0746, 2012 MT 125, NIGEL and JAMI DAVIS, husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:56 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury selection — Batson challenge A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Ricky Davis, also known as Rickey Davis, appellant, of voluntary manslaughter and use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence following the death of Keenan Dixon on September 18, 2014. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:38 am by Kent Scheidegger
The transcript of oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:19 am
Regina v Hills; Regina v Pomfret; Regina v Davies Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A consecutive prison sentence could be added to a life sentence where the circumstances warranted it. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:56 am by sally
Regina (Davies and Another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Regina (Gaines-Cooper) v Same Court of Appeal “The Revenue had not altered its interpretation or guidance in assessing whether taxpayers had achieved non-resident status. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:24 am by Daily Record Staff
Prior to trial, Davis moved to suppress evidence and to sever ... [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by sally
Solicitors Regulation Authority v Davis and another [2011] WLR (D) 36 “Where a solicitor admitted disciplinary charges, and therefore anticipated sanctions upon him, he should give notice in advance of the hearing to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that he intended to contend either that no order for costs should be made against him, in exercise of the tribunal’s power under section 47(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974, or that… [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court just heard an argument in the case of Kentucky v Davis. [read post]