Search for: "v. In Re: Search Warrant" Results 1 - 20 of 2,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2017, 10:50 am by Lisa Daniels
In In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-01 to Google, Judge Rueter reached the opposite result and ruled in favor of the government. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:06 am by Jeff Welty
As a general rule, the police need a search warrant to search private property. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am by Jeff Welty
Law enforcement officers often seek search warrants for suspects’ cell phones. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am by Jeff Welty
Law enforcement officers often seek search warrants for suspects’ cell phones. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 10:25 pm
A case from New Hampshire - United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by wmxadmin
You’re Going To Need A Warrant For That  So if you are arrested, can the cops search your phone? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm by Orin Kerr
(Let's assume we're only dealing with state warrants; as the court notes, federal warrants could be a different story.) [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
The warrant authorizes agents to search the computer for eight different categories of electronic records, and Defendant argues that probable cause does not support the search for . . . four categories of records.U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:58 pm by Sophia Cope
We urged the court to hold that the Fourth Amendment requires a probable cause warrant for all device searches, irrespective of how the devices are searched, in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Riley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:58 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
Cell Phone Searches and the 4th Amendment: You’re Going to Need a Warrant for That A recent Supreme Court ruling took a strong stance in support of privacy, preventing law enforcement officers from searching individuals’ cell phones without a warrant. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm by Michael Lowe
US Supreme Court Okays Police Entering Home Without a Search Warrant The United States Supreme Court ruled yesterday in the case of Fernandez v. [read post]