Search for: "v. In Re: Search Warrant" Results 61 - 80 of 2,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
P.41(b)(5), Rule 41 is silent as to whether a federal court may issue a warrant for the search of property located outside of the United States.In re: Two email accounts stored at Google, Inc., supra. [read post]
  In so holding, the court contrasted the warrant at issue in Chatrie with the one in In re Search of Information That Is Stored at the Premises Controlled by Google LLC, No. 21-sc-3217, 2021 WL 6196136 (D.D.C. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Supreme Court considered the issue of false information's being used to get a search warrant. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:38 pm by Orin Kerr
See In re Search Warrant, 71 A. 3d 1158 (Vt. 2012) (rejecting “any blanket prohibition on ex ante search warrant instructions”); see also In the Matter of a Warrant for All Content & Other Info. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
The search warrant was then executed, although the search proved almost entirely a flop. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
So if the warrant said, for example, "The police are hereby authorized and instructed to search the house," the police could only search . . . the house.But, today, the Court of Appeal holds that that's no longer the case. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:17 am by Susan Brenner
The government later obtained and executed a second search warrant for the laptop, but we’re not concerned with it . . . we’re only concerned with the first search warrant. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:47 am
However, the federal courts have adopted what is commonly referred to as the "reasonable continuation doctrine" under which police may in some circumstances temporarily suspend a search authorized by a warrant and re-enter the premises at a later time to continue the search. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
  For example, personally I'm a fan of warrants before the police invade a home.But there's a ton of precedent that makes it clear that you don't have standing to challenge a search when you're not permitted to be there. [read post]