Search for: "v. In Re: Search Warrant" Results 81 - 100 of 2,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2016, 10:08 am by John Floyd
  Plain View Exception to Search Warrant   In 1990, the Supreme Court in Horton v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by Susan Brenner
  As Wikipedia also explains, to be “reasonable” a search or seizure must be conducted pursuant to a search (and seizure) warrant or pursuant to one of several exceptions to the warrant requirement. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Orin Kerr
They allow the government to search the place to be searched for the items described, allowing “a properly commissioned officer” to execute the warrant “to further the government’s purposes. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
Cochran, 939 F.2d 337 (6th Cir. 1991) (agents executing search warrant may require occupant who has departed the premises to be searched to re-enter residence and remain there while the search is conducted); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The search warrant from last December is here: Search Warrant [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 632, 634, 651–653 (1950) (Federal Trade Commission reporting re­quirement); Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
The nature of seizure of all computer files in a document search involving a Pennsylvania State Senator usually requires that they be searched off site to determine whether they are pertinent, and that does not make execution or the warrant unreasonable. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Anglin had called for another officer to assist and this officer took the passenger into custody based on outstanding warrants but subsequently released him when uncertainty arose as to whether the warrants were extraditable. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
The search warrant was then executed, although the search proved almost entirely a flop. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
   And the 6th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]