Search for: "v. NP, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
The judge held that the defence of statutory acquiescence raised by the Defendants under section 48 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994), could not succeed because the five year period only starts to run when the earlier trade mark owner has knowledge of both the use of the later trade mark, and of its registration (applying Case C-482/09, Budejovický Budvar np v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2011] ECR I-08701). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” ““The doctrine of the ‘law of the case’ is a rule of practice, an articulation of sound policy that, when an issue is once judicially determined, that should be the end of the matter as far as Judges and courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction are concerned” (Erickson v Cross Ready Mix, Inc., 98 AD3d 717, 717 [2d Dept 2012]; Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165 [1975]). [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:03 am by Howard Bashman
Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Lidocaine HCl Topical Solution 4%, 50ml, has been recalled by Teligent Pharma, Inc. due to super potency. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
Circuit declined to hold that all national parks governed by the NPS rules were traditional public forums, where free speech and other First Amendment rights are at their zenith. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 Jonathan Markell’s 18 months behind bars is perhaps the most given in a transnational antiquities trafficking case since U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
  Np likelihood of confusion shownCourts within the Second Circuit use the eight Polaroid factors, as enumerated in Polaroid Corp. v Polarad Elecs. [read post]