Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 181 - 200 of 1,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2015, 10:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
Tinseltown Cinema, LLC v City of Olive Branch, 2015 WL 872157 (MS App. 3/3/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://judicial.mc.edu/case.php? [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Barnett's critique of "minimum rationality" when used mindlessly to uphold rent seeking regulation like that in Williamson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:39 am by Douglas A. Berman
As reviewed by this recent Forbes article, headlined "Big Court Defeat For Marijuana Despite Record Tax Harvests," the Ninth Circuit late last week in Olive v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:53 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- In a recent book entitled Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck, author Adam Cohen examines the case of Buck v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
In Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace (Case 34/10) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that any non-fertilised but parthenogenically stimulated human ovum constitutes a "human embryo" within the meaning of Article 6(2)(c) as it is capable of commencing the process of development of a human being in the same way as an embryo created by fertilisation of an ovum. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Sides with Vaccine Manufacturers in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:28 pm
In this unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal (Fifth District) affirmed a default judgment that includes a $50,000 punitive damages award.The appellant asked the court to strike the punitive damages award because the plaintiff did not comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 425.115. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:31 am by Russ Bensing
  The State relied heavily on Lakewood v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
(NYPL)Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:47 am
Under New York City Council employment discrimination law, according to Williams v. [read post]