Search for: "v. doe et al" Results 1 - 20 of 8,808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:12 am by Kent Berk
Jack Richard Hannallah, MD et al.*, does not create legal precedent, its insights into the Adult Protective Services Act (APSA) are invaluable for those navigating the legal landscape of elder law, guardianship, and conservatorship. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 Sources, Characteristics and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Two Legal Challenges Already Filed However, two recent lawsuits filed by the Chamber of Commerce (et. al) and Ryan, LLC challenge the FTC’s authority to issue this rule and its classification of non-compete agreements as unfair methods of competition. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
After rage-tweeting throughout the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:18 am by Ryan A. Glasgow and Jason P. Brown
Tex., Apr. 23, 2024) by a tax services firm in Texas federal court; then in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]