Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation" Results 481 - 500 of 884
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 11:46 am by Arthur F. Coon
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:41 pm by Patricia Salkin
Because of this, the court held that the owners did not allege a taking arising out of city board of adjustment decision requiring removal of billboard pursuant to city zoning ordinance and, therefore, the city retained immunity from inverse condemnation claim. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Anthony B. Cavender
., the Texas Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the Court of Appeals for the First District that the plaintiffs, homeowners residing in the upper White Oak Bayou watershed, raised a “fact question” in their inverse condemnation lawsuit against the defendants. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The Court of Appeal held that the 90-day statute of limitations in section 66499.37 applied to the inverse condemnation action based on Hensler v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:47 pm by Steven E. Black
This is also known as Condemnation Taking, Declaration of Taking, Notice of Taking, and possibly Inverse Condemnation. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:47 pm by Steven E. Black
This is also known as Condemnation Taking, Declaration of Taking, Notice of Taking, and possibly Inverse Condemnation. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” Boiling down the case’s somewhat complicated procedural history and factual background, the Agency’s MSHCP “refinement” action was contemplated by both a settlement of prior eminent domain/inverse condemnation litigation between Riverside County and Busch, and by a complex and conditional multi-phased Purchase and Sale Agreement (“PSA”) between the Agency and Busch involving the subject 200-acre parcel and 700-plus acres of additional… [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
Robert Thomas at Inverse Condemnation rounds up reactions. [read post]
25 May 2015, 10:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
“Thus, we ask, In an inverse condemnation action, must there be an actual physical taking or invasion of the landowner’s property? [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:10 pm by Aimee Hess
This is a form of inverse condemnation, for which compensation should be paid by the oil companies and the mineral owners. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:45 pm
Unique issue in an inverse condemnation case Unlike a traditional condemnation case, an inverse condemnation case puts the landowner in the plaintiff position and the government on the defense. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:48 pm by Brad Kuhn
In California eminent domain actions, absent special circumstances (such as an abandonment, successful right to take challenge, or inverse condemnation finding), a property or business owner is typically only entitled to recover litigation expenses (attorneys’ fees and expert costs) in one circumstance:  where the public agency’s final offer of compensation is unreasonable and the property owner’s final demand is reasonable. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:43 am by David Snyder
  A “de facto” condemnation – sometimes known as an “inverse condemnation” – occurs when a condemnor’s actions cause the equivalent of a taking before a declaration of taking is filed. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:14 am by Ben Rubin
 Learning of these comments, the plaintiff filed an action for common law defamation and interference with prospective business advantage, as well as a claim for inverse condemnation. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:44 am by Brian A. Buchanan
The Court of Appeals went through a lengthy discussion about the history of land condemnation law, and the fact that the State does have the power to take an individual’s property for the public good, and then pay the individual for the property. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:24 am by Cale
In some cases, property owners are indirectly affected, which in most cases would be inverse condemnation. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm by Jarod Bona
If you don’t know what a Taking is, you can read this short article distinguishing eminent domain and inverse condemnation (takings). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:23 am by Patricia Salkin
Twp. of Ocean, 2015 WL 263913 (N.J. 1/22/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A-55-13Griepenburg.pdf Filed under: Condemnation/Eminent Domain, Current Caselaw Tagged: exhaustion of administrative remedies, inverse condemnation [read post]