Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 501 - 520
of 890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
A “de facto” condemnation – sometimes known as an “inverse condemnation” – occurs when a condemnor’s actions cause the equivalent of a taking before a declaration of taking is filed. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
Learning of these comments, the plaintiff filed an action for common law defamation and interference with prospective business advantage, as well as a claim for inverse condemnation. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals went through a lengthy discussion about the history of land condemnation law, and the fact that the State does have the power to take an individual’s property for the public good, and then pay the individual for the property. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
When incidents do occur, when do agencies face potential liability in inverse condemnation? [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:24 am
In some cases, property owners are indirectly affected, which in most cases would be inverse condemnation. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm
If you don’t know what a Taking is, you can read this short article distinguishing eminent domain and inverse condemnation (takings). [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:23 am
Twp. of Ocean, 2015 WL 263913 (N.J. 1/22/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A-55-13Griepenburg.pdf Filed under: Condemnation/Eminent Domain, Current Caselaw Tagged: exhaustion of administrative remedies, inverse condemnation [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
If you’re interested in learning more about this particular issue, and how it can affect regulatory takings claims, assemblage theories, and damages in eminent domain and inverse condemnation actions, I will be presenting on this topic at the ALI-CLE Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation Seminar later this week in San Francisco. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:29 pm
Joe Murphy, Yoram Ben–Amram, and Galtex Development, LLC sued the City of Galveston claiming that the City unconstitutionally took their property without just compensation through inverse condemnation. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:25 pm
The complaint alleged causes of action for inverse condemnation, as well as public and private nuisance. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
NY Appellate Courts Finds a Reasonable Probability That Wetlands Designation Is a Regulatory Taking Under Penn Central | Hat tip to Robert Thomas, Esq. at the Inverse Condemnation Blog for posting this. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:28 pm
” Editor’s note: Hat tip to Robert Thomas, Esq. at the Inverse Condemnation Blog for posting this. http://www.inversecondemnation.com ; See also, Bulldozers at Your Doorstep blog – http://eminent-domain-blog.com/appellate-division-affirms-75-increment-applicable-wetlands-taking/ New Creek Bluebelt, Phase 4 v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
If you have an inverse condemnation case, or if you’re challenging the government’s right to take, then yes, you need an attorney. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Gideon and Mike will provide their own unique perspectives, gathered from their decades of experience at the very eye of the eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and regulatory taking storm. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
Citadel’s claim, a copy of which can be accessed here, is likely a precursor to the filing of an inverse condemnation action. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:19 am
On Friday, November 21, 2014, the Court granted Defendant Bonner County (“Bonner County”) summary judgment on all Plaintiff SilverWing at Sandpoint, LLC’s (“SilverWing”) federal claims for inverse condemnation, or “taking,” of private property by a public entity without just compensation, in violation of the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:23 pm
So we all know generally how eminent domain and inverse condemnation work. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:28 pm
While D2’s application has been denied, there was no evidence that it has availed itself of the state’s inverse condemnation procedures, and thus, this claim was dismiss as unripe. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:47 pm
To satisfy Williamson County’s state-procedures requirement, plaintiffs “must not only file a state law inverse condemnation claim they must also be denied just compensation through a final adjudication in state court. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:47 pm
To satisfy Williamson County’s state-procedures requirement, plaintiffs “must not only file a state law inverse condemnation claim they must also be denied just compensation through a final adjudication in state court. [read post]
