Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 541 - 560
of 890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am
The Court dismissed three of Pacific Shores' causes of action for inverse condemnation, CEQA violations and violations of the California Constitution saying it did not have jurisdiction over those causes of action and that they can be filed again in state court. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:22 pm
Gould’s Takings claim was found not to be ripe as he had not yet applied or been rejected pursuant to the inverse condemnation procedures provided in the Pennsylvania’s Eminent Domain Code. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
They’ve sued the City of Dallas for breach of contract (the lease), inverse condemnation (for taking their leasehold interest without compensation), and fraud (for representing that special use permits would come, knowing they wouldn’t) in connection with a 2008 oil and gas lease over 3,600 acres of City of Dallas land. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:39 am
It was hosted by the ABA’s Government and Public Sector Lawyers Division and moderated by Hawaii land use lawyer Robert Thomas, who has much more at his Inverse Condemnation blog. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm
Quoting Hawaii lawyer Robert Thomas at the Inverse Condemnation blog: Next Thursday, February 6, 2014, we’ll be in Chicago to moderate an American Bar Association discussion/debate on a topic that’s not our usual takings-eminent domain-land use stuff, but is still one of the hotter topics around. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm
Sandvold Inverse Condemnation – Leone v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
In 2008, the plaintiff filed an action for inverse condemnation. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
Maybe you think these are suckers, or that an entire industry shouldn’t be condemned for a few bad apples. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:04 am
The Elements of a Taking Claim The elements of an inverse condemnation claim are (1) the governmental entity intentionally performed an act in the exercise of its lawful authority, (2) that resulted in the taking, damaging, or destruction of the claimant’s property, (3) for public use. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:43 am
Leaving aside: (1) the difficulty of maintaining a case for inverse condemnation, or “taking” by one public entity against another where the express language of the Fifth Amendment provides that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use without just compensation,” see, e.g., Complaint, ¶ 106 [emphasis added]; and (2) the hurdle of obtaining declaratory and injunctive relief as a remedy for unconstitutional taking, where the law is… [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:05 am
The hotel owner's inverse condemnation attorneys were not involved in negotiating the settlement. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:33 pm
The Court in McNamara chronicled the key differences between these two related claims, providing some crucial lessons for those involved with eminent domain and inverse condemnation actions. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
The only claims alleged against the State of California and Cal EPA were for inverse condemnation and declaratory relief. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
Plaintiff filed its complaint against the County and others alleging causes of action for inverse condemnation and civil rights violations seeking damages, a writ of mandate and other equitable relief. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The claim was denied under the insurance policy exclusion for inverse condemnation. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:06 am
It's not too often a property owner succeeds with an inverse condemnation/regulatory takings claim based on a general plan amendment or zone change. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
THORNTON, III; JEAN THORNTON; MARKHAMAT (MYA) ABDUJALALOVA; and ROBERT DEAN, Respondents. 3rd District.Inverse condemnation -- Limitation of actions -- Trial court properly ruled that stabilization doctrine did not hold statute of limitations on inverse condemnation claim in abeyance until county abandoned its efforts to remediate flooding on property which property owner claimed was result of county road improvement activity that altered existing drainage pattern --… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:26 am
Zoning Board of Appeals (Inverse condemnation; "The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether there is evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff...waived the provisions of General Statutes § 51-183b by executing more than one agreement to extend the time for the court to render judgment. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm
In our niche practice of eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and regulatory takings, the blogosphere world is going bonkers. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Appellants then filed inverse condemnation claims under article I, § 20 of the Hawaii Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, alleging that Maui County had engaged in regulatory takings by depriving their properties of any economically viable use. [read post]
