Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 561 - 580
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
Under Williamson County's state litigation requirement, even though a plaintiff is asserting a federal takings claim, she must first seek and be denied compensation via state procedures (which include a lawsuit for inverse condemnation under state law). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 pm
I do nothing since my property is not worth too much, and I don't want to pay my lawyer to bring an inverse condemnation claim. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:28 pm
Robert Thomas, a leading commentator on takings law, has a helpful summary of the case at the Inverse Condemnation blog. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:14 am
However, you should know that in most states, if you succeed, the condemning authority is responsible to reimburse you for your attorney’s fees and costs. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
I. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
THORNTON, III; JEAN THORNTON; MARKHAMAT (MYA) ABDUJALALOVA; and ROBERT DEAN, Respondents. 3rd District.Inverse condemnation -- Limitation of actions -- Trial court properly ruled that stabilization doctrine did not hold statute of limitations on inverse condemnation claim in abeyance until county abandoned its efforts to remediate flooding on property which property owner claimed was result of county road improvement activity that altered existing drainage pattern --… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
Knick did not, however, file an inverse condemnation suit under state law to seek compensation for such taking. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal considered whether privately owned drainage on private property allows for homeowner remedies by inverse condemnation if the water in the private pipeline is for public use. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
The court held there that the plaintiff could not bring a takings claim in federal court until the plaintiff had pursued an inverse-condemnation action—that is, a lawsuit seeking compensation for the alleged taking—in state court. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
Procedural History The owners filed an inverse condemnation action, claiming that, under Lucas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
S. 172 (1985) because no state court had denied compensation under state inverse condemnation law. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:33 am
The trial court subsequently granted the Commission’s motion for summary adjudication on the inverse condemnation (not yet ripe), breach of contract, and estoppel (no claim until a valid building permit obtained, analogous to a vested rights claim) claims. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
While it comes as no surprise that individuals or private companies have no say so when it comes to telling the government how to spend tax dollars, the question then becomes whether the inverse would be true as well. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:28 am
While it comes as no surprise that individuals or private companies have no say so when it comes to telling the government how to spend tax dollars, the question then becomes whether the inverse would be true as well. [read post]
4 May 2018, 12:24 pm
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
Arcadia also alleged that the Density Restriction was a prejudicial abuse of discretion and that Arcadia was entitled to inverse condemnation and damages for denial of equal protection and violation of civil rights. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Arcadia did not challenge the adoption of Measure P in 1990, but in 2004 after the City failed to remove the Density Restriction from Measure C, Arcadia filed suit claiming illegal spot zoning, inverse condemnation and damages for denial of equal protection and a violation of civil rights. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Litigation: CEQA; General Plans and Zoning; Clean Water Act; Easements, implied and express dedications; Covenants, conditions, and restrictions; Failure to disclose in real estate transactions; Land use entitlements; Eminent domain and inverse condemnation; Board of Supervisors or City Council land use approvals; AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act; Land use construction defect; and California tribal consultation. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:46 pm
Here are some highlights: The court's discussion of inverse condemnation, beginning on page 6. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm
Most water districts have very limited budgets and so will be reluctant to fight landowners' inverse condemnation suits. [read post]
