Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation" Results 741 - 760 of 890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The property owner brought claims for negligence, nuisance and inverse condemnation because the sewer company "physically took portions of the wood piles which rendered them unusable and damaged the E-L Building. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:58 pm by Marc Policastro
  The Court recognized that where a town physically takes property without first bringing a formal condemnation proceeding, property owners are permitted to initiate an inverse condemnation legal action, and to petition the court for just compensation for the taking. [read post]
We won't be reviewing them  (they are not precedential after all), but you may want to check them out if you are interested in public use and redevelopment (case #1), or inverse condemnation by permit denial (case #2): RLR Investments, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Bill Ward
  See our previous blog post of August 6, 2009,  Inverse condemnation at the beach. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
I do nothing since my property is not worth too much, and I don't want to pay my lawyer to bring an inverse condemnation claim. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:47 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
However, equity demands that the property owners are not barred from bringing an inverse condemnation claim. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:20 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
June 9, 2010) - denial of Beneficial Use Determination started limitations period on an as-applied takings claim, meaning that inverse condemnation complaints were timely filed. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:20 am by Alan Ackerman
William Potter provided the below opinion, calling “inverse condemnation” the next battleground for reform. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:47 am by stacy
  If you are challenging the government’s right to take, or if you are pursuing an inverse condemnation case, you will need to hire an eminent domain attorney. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:56 pm by Lauren
  A successful trial lawyer, he represents both business and property owners in direct and inverse condemnation litigation and has recovered over $100 million on their behalf. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:35 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
., May 18, 2010) (inverse condemnation, nuisance, damages, attorneys' fees). [read post]
13 May 2010, 11:51 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Lastly, the court bluntly rejected the Department's claim that the Florida legislature replaced the common law claim for inverse condemnation for destruction of citrus trees with a statutory claim. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:04 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
A124661 (Apr. 11, 2010), the California Court of Appeals (First District) held that a property owner did not muster sufficient proof to support its claim for inverse condemnation against a neighboring sewage treatment facility. [read post]
Like how the court rejected an inverse condemnation theory which alleged that as a result of road-widening project, plowed snow and water runoff entered the plaintiff's property and damaged a building (before the project moved the road closer to the building, thrown snow was not a problem). [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:00 am by Ilya Somin
UPDATE #2: the Inverse Condemnation Blog has a summary of another amicus brief supporting VFW filed by the National Association of Home Builders and the Wisconsin Building Association. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:06 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D.
  If FAA were to presume to control land use planning off airport, it would also be subject to legal and constitutional constraints on land use planning such as the deprivation of a landowners’ reasonable use and enjoyment of property (“nuisance”) and/or the taking of property without just compensation (“inverse condemnation”), a result FAA wants to avoid at all costs. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm by Aaron Lindstrom
 Turning to a second issue, the Court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the blueberry farms’ claims for inverse condemnation, because the injury they suffered was not peculiar or unique, but rather was the same kind (though worse in degree) of injury that all properties adjacent to the roads suffered. [read post]