Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 161 - 180
of 884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
As we all get into the holiday spirit, don’t forget to keep your skills and knowledge sharp for what is looking to shape up as a very active 2020 in the projects arena. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma County’s use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the County’s rural Knights Valley area. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
In an opinion filed September 5, and later certified for partial publication on October 3, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment upholding the City of Chico’s EIR and related statement of overriding considerations for Walmart’s project to expand an existing store, add a gas station, and create two new outparcels for future commercial development. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:00 am
Most homeowners are surprised to learn that almost all homeowners’ policies include exclusions for damage caused by sewage water originating outside their home. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
In a 68-page published opinion filed September 27, 2019, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:06 pm
Court Holding The federal district court concluded that plaintiff’s inverse condemnation and regulatory takings claims rested on demonstrating a constitutionally protected property interest. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
She brought a declaratory and injunctive relief action in Pennsylvania state court on the ground that the ordinance effected a taking of her property; however, she did not bring an inverse condemnation action under state law for the alleged taking. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
She brought a declaratory and injunctive relief action in Pennsylvania state court on the ground that the ordinance effected a taking of her property; however, she did not bring an inverse condemnation action under state law for the alleged taking. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:09 pm
We expect the law on inverse condemnation to continue to evolve over the next several years. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
We recently reported on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Oroville which provided a relaxed standard for public agencies facing inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:19 am
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 11:17 am
As it explained, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for inverse condemnation or de facto appropriation because he didn’t allege any restraint on the use of his own property. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am
The first is the physical invasion taking where a claim for inverse condemnation is made when the government enters or allows others to enter, your property. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
In an opinion originally filed on July 31, and belatedly ordered published on August 22, 2019, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 3) affirmed a judgment granting a CEQA writ petition invalidating the final EIR and project entitlements for the Millennium Project, a controversial proposed mixed-use development on a 4.47-acre parcel straddling Vine Street and surrounding the historic Capital Records Building in Hollywood. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Who owns an inverse condemnation claim? [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 12:00 pm
Karan, 70 A.3d 524 (N.J. 2013) In re Stockton, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Dec. 2018) On the issue of statutes of limitation for inverse condemnation claims, our amicus brief is here. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Introduction And Overview On August 19, 2019, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous 38-page opinion, authored by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, in the CEQA “project definition” case we’ve been tracking with interest. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Background A long time ago, in a legal galaxy far, far away, Emperor Reagan signed the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) into law. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Both the trial court and the Court of Appeal held the City liable under inverse condemnation. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:00 am
Maryland Court of Special Appeals Constitutional Law; Inverse condemnation: A landowner’s inverse condemnation claim against the county was barred by the statute of limitations where it was filed more than three years after the final administrative agency decision denying the landowner’s variance requests, the point at which the claim accrued because it was then that ... [read post]
