Posts tagged with: "1872"
Results 641 - 660
of 866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm
Explanation--An agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:47 am
(RMS), No. 10-1872 (1st Cir. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:20 am
Ltd. derived its juristic basis from the fact that the arbitration clause is merely a collateral term in the main agreement.While this alone is not the justification for the Separability Presumption, the Supreme Court went on to hold:“But where the contract or instrument is voidable at the option of a party (as for example under section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872), the invalidity that attaches itself to the main agreement may also attach itself to the arbitration agreement,… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AR, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 857 (26 July 2011) Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862 (26 July 2011) Rust Consulting Ltd v PB Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 899 (26 July 2011) Destiny 1 Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 831 (26 July 2011) MH (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 901 (26 July 2011) DRL Ltd v Wincanton… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
[Note that the Indian position would be similar by virtue of section 29 of the Contract Act, 1872 which treats certain agreements as void for uncertainty.] [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:38 pm
But where the contract or instrument is voidable at the option of a party (as for example under section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872), the invalidity that attaches itself to the main agreement may also attach itself to the arbitration agreement, if the reasons which make the main agreement voidable, exist in relation to the making of the arbitration agreement also. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:40 am
Justice Peter Zarella wrote in the decision that Flavio failed to show good cause – as defined by an 1869 Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors decision that was upheld by the US Supreme Court in 1872 – as to why it should not have to forfeit Sheriff’s bonds. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:48 am
Figurative sense of "to startle, surprise" is from 1872. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:28 pm
27 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions Body: Below is today's workers' compensation Appellate Court opinion: AC32728 - Mele v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:06 pm
State, AIR 1954 SC 1, this Court has indicated that the presumption permitted to be drawn under Section 114, Illustration (a) of the Evidence Act 1872 has to be drawn under the 'important time factor'. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court ruling from 1872 in Dexter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:15 am
By this statute, land near hot springs in Banff, Alberta, that had been set aside as a reserve became the 1st national park in Canada -- and the 2d in North America, the United States having established Yellowstone National Park in 1872. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Miami Dade county had 2768 new foreclosures, a drop of more than 60%, year-over-year, while Broward county had 1872 new foreclosures and Palm Beach county had 2006. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
--An agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
--An agreement or compromise which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of this rule.” [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
Kankuben (Gujarat HC)Aspects: Compromise to be recognized by the court must not be void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
Kankuben (Gujarat HC)Aspects: Compromise to be recognized by the court must not be void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
" Although that statute has been in place since 1872, Kimes is the first published appellate decision to so much as mention it. ~~~ Photo: "Dog and Cat Repair" by Flickr user lisatozzi, used under Creative Commons License. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
Anthony, on the Charge of Illegal Voting, at the Presidential Election in Nov., 1872, and on the Trial of Beverly W. [read post]
