Posts tagged with: "1875" Results 641 - 660 of 800
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
In South Carolina, a prosecutor said he struck a black potential juror because he “shucked and jived” when he walked.Studies have shown that racially diverse juries deliberate longer, consider a wider variety of perspectives and make fewer factual errors than all-white juries, and that predominantly black juries are less likely to impose the death penalty.Excluding jurors based on race has been illegal since 1875, but after Reconstruction, all-white juries remained the norm in… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
  She can be reached by email at cbertram@reganfirm.com or by phone 202-822-1875 in her office in Washington, D.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:36 pm by John Culhane
I suppose Google could try to fix this by paying her $1875 instead ($1500+$375), but then she has to pay the tax on that amount, and so on. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:13 am by LawDiva
. - The Supreme Court of Canada was established in 1875; - In 1892 Canada’s Criminal Code was enacted; - In 1917 the bill called “War Tax Upon Income” came into law as a temporary taxation law. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
 For example, in explaining why the Court's 1875 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  On a per capita basis, these targets would require reducing emissions to 1875 levels, or the approximate level of Grenada and Botswana. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm by NL
As a last point the Claimants/Respondents argued that the ditch on the remaining part of Rochdale's land was the source of the flooding and was an artificial construction, so that the principle in Broder v Saillard (1875-6) LR 2 ChD 692 and Hurdman v N.E. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm by NL
As a last point the Claimants/Respondents argued that the ditch on the remaining part of Rochdale's land was the source of the flooding and was an artificial construction, so that the principle in Broder v Saillard (1875-6) LR 2 ChD 692 and Hurdman v N.E. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:32 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
.' This article suggests, however, that cases along the model of Smith were quite familiar to the federal courts historically and may even have been the primary focus of the 1875 federal question statute. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  The  EJI describes the study as follows: Nearly 135 years after Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1875 to eliminate racial discrimination in jury selection, people of color continue to be excluded from jury service because of their race, especially in serious criminal trials and death penalty cases. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Steve Hall
Excluding jurors based on race has been illegal since 1875, but after Reconstruction, all-white juries remained the norm in the South. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:07 am
On this day in ...... 1875 (135 years ago today), Gracie Annie Lockhart became the 1st woman in the British Empire to earn a university degree. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:48 pm by Dan Ernst
Here’s the abstract:In contrast to the view that national immigration policy began in 1875, this article explores evidence that immigration policy dates from the early republic period. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:40 am by Peter Spiro
  The exceptional preemption regime for immigration has been justified by its inherent foreign relations component, back to the Supreme Court’s eloquent 1875 decision in Chy Lung v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:35 am by immigrationprof
Abstract: The Page Act of 1875 is usually characterized as an anti-prostitution law that... [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
  The era of open immigration lasted about a century, until Congress passed a law barring convicts and prostitutes in 1875. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:43 am by Dan Ernst
Zhu, a 2009 graduate of the Harvard Law School, has posted The Page Act of 1875: In the Name of Morality. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
  She can be reached by email at cbertram@reganfirm.com or by phone 202-822-1875 in her office in Washington, D.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 11:22 am by Randall Drew
Because it used to be easy to come back legally even if you had been here illegally in the past.Here is some history of immigration law from the USCIS itself:Act of March 3, 1875 (18 Statutes-at-Large 477)Established the policy of direct federal [read post]