Posts tagged with: "1901"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
United States, 280 U.S. 261, 267 (1901) (“We recall no instance where Congress has made a formal declaration of war against an Indian nation or tribe; but the fact that Indians are engaged in acts of general hostility to settlers, especially if the government has deemed it necessary to despatch [sic] a military force for their subjugation, is sufficient to constitute a state of war. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
On this day in 1901, the House of Commons debated the Factory and Workshop Bill. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:20 pm
Today, not only do we not try cross-species transfusions, but medical science has taught us the dangers of trying to transfuse across blood types: It was not until 1901, when the Austrian Karl Landsteiner discovered human blood groups, that blood transfusions became safer. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Alabama SB 62 (Constitutional Amendment) Provides Alabama courts “when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, the United States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, the Code of Alabama 1975, and rules promulgated thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States, provided the law of the other state does… [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:01 am
(Primary source: his obituary in the 23 Nov 1999 Philadelphia Inquirer)Lorin Blodgett (1823-1901), 3-great-grandson of Thomas Maule of Salem, Mass., and my 4th cousin four times removed: Among Lorin’s many careers were positions as manager of the Treasury Department’s financial and statistical reports, as appraiser-at-large of customs, and as special assistant in the Treasury Department. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Hunt, 113 Ga. 501, 38 S.E. 983 (1901). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:45 pm
Alford’s chapter on international law as interpretive tool from 1901 to 1945 discusses, among other things, the Supreme Court’s various approaches to the extraterritorial reach of statutes during that period. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
They quickly agreed and I had the good fortune to write a chapter on international law as an interpretative tool in the Supreme Court from 1901 to 1945. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:40 am
To focus on the editors (having just heaped praise upon them), for example, an introductory chapter co-authored by David Sloss discusses whether treaties afforded remedies to individuals, a chapter by Mike Ramsey on the period 1901-1945 focuses skillfully on Erie and three ways of understanding customary international law in its wake, and a chapter by Bill Dodge views the Sabbatino case in terms of customary international law as federal common law. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
The editors have chosen a series of periods, 1776-1860, 1860-1900, 1901-1945, 1946-2000, and after-2000. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:00 pm
Parts II through IV cover, respectively, the years from the Civil War to the end of the nineteenth century (1861-1900); the first half of the twentieth century through World War II (1901-1945); and the post-war years to the century’s end (1946-2000). [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 10:56 am
In the interest of disclosure, I would note that two Opinio Juris regulars participated in the volume: I authored the second chapter on how the Supreme Court dealt with treaties between 1861-1900 while Roger Alford authored the eighth chapter on international law as an interpretative tool in the Court during the 1901-1945 time frame. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:39 am
Van Alstine, Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1901–1945 Michael D. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
Of course, any common law developed completely between 1869 and 1901 would be valid, but anything thereafter that was created by the courts would not be "enacted by bill" and would be right out the window.That, of course, while entirely logical, is a nightmare. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:40 pm
12 Jul 2011, 6:45 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: SC18474 - Watts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
Alabama SB 62 (Constitutional Amendment) Provides Alabama courts “when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, the United States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, the Code of Alabama 1975, and rules promulgated thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States, provided the law of the other state does… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 12:42 am
Actually, it’s probably the “first-best” thing, as it contains over 10,000 recordings made by the Victor Talking Machine Company between 1901 and 1925. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Godard, 183 U.S. 79, 107 (1901). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
Morris, No. 142759, limited to the issue of whether the Court of Appeals’ “conditional affirmance” remedy is an appropriate method of resolving a violation under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 USC 1901 et seq. [read post]
