Posts tagged with: "206" Results 1581 - 1600 of 4,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2017, 8:09 am by John Jascob
In addition, they violated Rule 206(4)-7 by failing to adopt and implement appropriate policies and procedures and Section 207 of the Act by making untrue statements in SEC filings, according to the Commission. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:09 pm
Contact Shaw Family Law, P.C. at 630-206-3300 today to set up your initial consultation in our office. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 8:11 pm
Call Shaw Family Law, P.C. at 630-206-3300 today to schedule your initial consultation with us. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:48 pm
Call our team at 630-206-3300 at Shaw Family Law, P.C. today to set up your initial consultation with us. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:02 am by Patricia Salkin
The court also noted that the purpose of the various requirements of section 54–206(p) was to protect the health and safety of city patrons and carriage horses, while distancing the unwelcome elements of a barn, including noise, odors, waste, drainage, and pests from residential areas. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:11 am by Joe Wojciechowski
§ 77q(a), and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:35 am by Stefan Passantino
On its surface, Rule 206(4)-5, which bars investment advisors from managing public investment funds in jurisdictions where their political contributions or the contributions of their “covered associates” exceed $150 per election to elected officials who directly or indirectly oversee such funds, seems well suited to this task. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:35 pm by Staff Writer
However, in some circumstances, a court may revoke a driver’s license without a hearing, as per Illinois statute 625 ILCS 5/6-206 Discretionary authority to suspend or revoke license or permit; right to a hearing. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 9:15 am by Allison Tussey
The SEC’s complaint charges Walter Ng and Kelly Ng with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”); Bruce Horwitz with violating Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder; and The… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
If you a registered investment adviser, you are subject to Rule 206(4)-1: a. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:21 am by Doug Cornelius
Morgan Stanley willfully violated Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act by representing and providing information to the Fund’s Board that AMMB was providing advisory services for the benefit of the Fund, which it was not. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:17 pm by Stefan Passantino
As a bit of a history lesson, Rule 206(4)-5 became effective way back in September 13, 2010 and included the third-party solicitor ban. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
” The SEC identified the federal securities laws violations: “JCM willfully violated Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act in that, while acting as an investment adviser, it employed devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud clients or prospective clients, and engaged in transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon clients or prospective clients. [read post]