Posts tagged with: "277" Results 461 - 480 of 2,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 7:17 pm by John Rubin
App. 277, vacated his conviction, finding a denial of his speedy trial rights under the United States and North Carolina Constitutions. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion originally filed on July 31, and belatedly ordered published on August 22, 2019, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 3) affirmed a judgment granting a CEQA writ petition invalidating the final EIR and project entitlements for the Millennium Project, a controversial proposed mixed-use development on a 4.47-acre parcel straddling Vine Street and surrounding the historic Capital Records Building in Hollywood. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm by Barbara Lichman
Department of Parks & Recreation, 17 Cal.App.5th 277, 290 (2017), found that “Millennium’s failure to present any concrete project proposal, instead choosing concepts and ‘impact envelopes’ rather than an accurate, stable and finite project [description],” Ibid., p. 27, 14 CCR § 15378, failed to meet CEQA’s informational requirements. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:45 am by Gregory Forman
Johnson, 288 S.C. 270, 277-78, 341 S.E.2d 811 (Ct.App. 1986), indicated that “vague estimations of time and labor devoted to the case and extent of legal services rendered” are insufficient to sustain an attorney fee award. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Kristyn Shea
  Specifically, the Board issued 85,288 decisions to veterans, which not only exceeded its goal, but also represented an increase of 33, 277 decisions from FY 2017. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:14 am by Bill Marler
Of 277 people interviewed, 237 (86%) reported eating ground beef at home. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:53 am by The Murray Law Firm
Friday at…Apartments on Willow Oak Drive, which is just off of Highway 277 in Dentsville. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:02 pm by Mary Whisner
"congressional oversight" and headline(oversight) turns up 277.Hack 2: Require Term to Appear a LotIn Lexis, Westlaw, and Bloomberg Law, you can require that a term appears a certain number of times with the "atleast" operator. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:32 am by INFORRM
Any proper democracy needs what Lord Bingham referred to as a “free, active, professional and inquiring” media (Turkington v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 277, at 290). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:59 am by Dan Filler
The 277-acre Research Campus in Norman was named the No.1 research campus in the nation by the Association of Research Parks in 2013. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]