Posts tagged with: "301"
Results 421 - 440
of 5,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
According to the Gainesville Sun, two vehicles collided on U.S. 301 in the Orange Heights area at about 7:30 p.m. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
Section 5-1401 states that it shall not apply to any contract “to the extent provided to the contrary in . . . section 1-301 of the Uniform Commercial Code. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
In addition, failure of the owner, operator, or agent in charge of a covered facility to comply with the preventive controls provisions of the CGMP & PC rule (located in subparts A, C, D, E, F, and G of part 117) is prohibited by section 301(uu) of the Act (21 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:21 am
The station nonetheless continued to operate at reduced nighttime power (which it had been doing for its entire license term) and never filed an FCC Form 301, nor did it seek a further extension of its STA until September 7, 2022. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
AB 2243 proposed lowering the standard to 200 (200-300 is very unhealthy) before settling on 301, which is hazardous. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:07 am
A Section 301 investigation and tariffs? [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:07 am
A Section 301 investigation and tariffs? [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 11:59 am
Rivas, 2022) directs Cal/OSHA to consider adopting rules requiring (1) employers to distribute copies of heat-related illness prevention plans to all new employees and annually when temperatures reach 80 degrees for the first time each year (2) farmworkers to wear PPE at no more than 301 AQI, and (3) the creation of acclimatization protocols. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 11:56 am
The FHP said the driver of the pickup truck kept going north on U.S. 301 after the accident. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Bad Settlements 301: Jeremy Diamond’s Joint Submission Jeremy Diamond might be the most recognizable lawyer in Ontario. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
at 823; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 301-302; Hall v Hobbick, 192 AD3d 776, 778). [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:00 pm
To learn more, contact us at 301-519-2801 or via our online form. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:21 am
The FCC’s Media Bureau (“Bureau”) issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”) proposing a fine of $13,000 against the licensee of two low power television stations, finding that the licensee apparently violated section 74.788 of the FCC’s Rules by filing its “license to cover” applications informing the FCC that it had completed construction of new facilities for the stations when that construction was completed, and for violating… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 11:47 am
In re Petering, 301 F.2d 681 (C.C.P.A. 1962), decided by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (the predecessor of the Federal Circuit) in 1962, provides an example in which the court holds that prior art disclosing a genus of 20 chemical compounds anticipated a species falling within that genus. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
Also, U.S. railcar producers shifted production to Mexico so that they could still use Chinese parts, including FRCs and avoid paying 25% Section 301 tariffs. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:11 pm
Contact us today at 301-519-2801 or via our online form to set up your consultation. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
The US administration implemented Section 301 tariffs on products from China, consciously exceeding tariff bindings (hence breaching WTO rules) with respect to products of that country. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
The US administration implemented Section 301 tariffs on products from China, consciously exceeding tariff bindings (hence breaching WTO rules) with respect to products of that country. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am
” “”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinary :reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages'” (Rudolf Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438,442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d… [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:28 am
It also asked whether any attest engagements are being performed pursuant to AT 301, AT 401, or AT 701 and for a description of the circumstances surrounding such engagements. [read post]
