Posts tagged with: "301" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2019, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
There is a bit of movement in this week's list of the Top 5 Recent Tax Paper Downloads, with a new paper debuting on the list at #5: [344 Downloads] The Arm's Length Standard Is Not the Problem, by Lorraine Eden (Texas A&M) [301 Downloads] Boiling Starbucks’ Roasting Down to... [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 3:00 pm by Larry
The imported LPD tiles lack any of those features.Given the lack of features indicating use with automatic data processing systems and no strong evidence of that use, the Court found the LPD tiles to be classified as monitors of 8528.59.33, which are dutiable at 5% (give or take Section 301 duties).I consider this to be one of those fascinating questions about the convergence of computer technology and everything else in the world. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
[I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.] [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:13 pm by Adam Schwartz
COPRA also bars enforcement of pre-dispute arbitration agreements, in section 301(d). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:09 am by Kevin Kaufman
Trade Representative (USTR) opened a Section 301 investigation into whether the tax was discriminatory against the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:01 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday, the United States Trade Representative (USTR)--which is the title of a presidential appointee at the rank of an ambassador (presently Robert Lighthizer), who has an entire agency, the Office of the USTR, working under him--published the findings (PDF) from the first segment of its Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974) investigation into France's Digital Services Tax. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm by News Desk
As part of its enforcement activities, the Food and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities under its jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The most widely used BIM Addenda are the ConsensusDocs 301 document and the AIA E-202. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 8:02 am by Kylea Brown and Fred Rocafort
Our customs team has lately been getting a lot of questions from clients regarding 301 tariff rates and what they must do to secure a refund on granted product exclusions. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 10:44 am by Russell Dufault (Toronto)
While there are some nuances with respect to the type of collateral in which the security interest has been granted which require analysis beyond the scope of this post, generally speaking, Article 9-301 of the UCC requires that for a debtor, irrespective of whether it is a U.S. or any foreign entity, the local law of the jurisdiction where the debtor is located will govern perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in the debtor’s… [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Sara DePasquale
This new reporting law is in addition to the universal mandatory reporting law for child abuse, neglect, or dependency required by G.S. 7B-301**. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice must prove that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302 [2002]; Biberaj v Acocella, 120 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2014]). [read post]