Posts tagged with: "363"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 4:02 am
Docksley’s comments align with those made by dissenting Grand Chamber Judge Ranzoni, who was joined by Kūris, Grosez, Eicke and Schembri Orland. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:40 am
In response to this issue, a Senator has reintroduced Senate Bill 363. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
The deadline for responses to the Ways and Means Committee request for information regarding nonprofit political activities, inappropriate use of charitable funds, and rise in foreign sources of funding has been extended from Labor Day to Friday, September 8, 2023. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Conducting Section 363 Sales Get familiar with the requirements for a sale under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, the different methods of selling assets in a bankruptcy proceeding, and the differences between a Section 363 sale and a sale outside of bankruptcy. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:55 pm
By passing a bill to rein in non-agricultural uses of bee-killing neonics, California can build on a good year for pollinator protections. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 2:18 pm
District Court decision of January 13, 2023 Early in 2023, said private international law issues arose before the District Court of The Hague (ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2023:363). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 11:37 am
In the South Korea case, five different entities ended up paying a total of $363 million to settle the matter. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:35 am
New York Social Services Law § 363-d. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 am
New York Social Services Law § 363-d. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
Contents include:ArticlesKirandeep Kaur, Ben Grama, Nairita Roy Chaudhuri, & Maria Jose Recalde-Vela, Ethics and Epistemic Injustice in the Global South: A Response to Hopman’s Human Rights Exceptionalism as Justification for Covert Research Marieke Janne Hopman, Guleid Ahmed Jama, Olga Zvonareva, Artūrs Hoļavins, & Anonymous, Speaking of Epistemic Injustice: A Reply Julia Hernandez & Anne Levesque, Movement Lawyering and the Caring Society Litigation … [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:36 am
On August 3, 2023, the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) and the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (“CIRO”) issued Staff Notice 31-363 – Client Focused Reforms: Review of Registrants’ Conflicts of Interest Practices and Additional Guidance (the “Report”), containing the much-anticipated results of a comprehensive compliance sweep of registered dealers, portfolio managers and investment fund managers conducted in 2022. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:59 am
See Application of Ponath, 829 F.Supp. 363, 368 (D. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
* See Retirement and Social Security Law §§363[c][a]; 363-c[e][a]). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
* See Retirement and Social Security Law §§363[c][a]; 363-c[e][a]). [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:25 pm
Ultimately, five different entities paid a total of $363 million in the largest False Claims Act antitrust recovery as well as the largest False Claims Act settlement involving bid rigging to date. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm
The Supreme court reversed the case and established the precedent that certain mergers are so clearly likely to lessen competition that they must be prohibited in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary: [A] merger which produces a firm controlling an undue percentage share of the relevant market, and results in a significant increase in the concentration of firms in that market is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined in the absence of evidence… [read post]
