Posts tagged with: "369"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
On Monday, the court is expected to release orders from the February 28 conference at 9:30 a.m. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm
" Ex parte Capital U–Drive–It, 369 S.C. 1 (2006). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: TAGNETICS INC., Case No. 19‐30822 Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Granting Petitioning Creditors’ Motion for Contempt (Doc. 145) and Determining Additional Interest as a Remedy to Enforce Compliance This matter is before the court on the Motion to Hold Tagnetics in Indirect Contempt (doc. 145) (the “Motion”), filed by petitioning creditors Jonathan Hager,… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
See Argos USA LLC d/b/a Argos Ready Mix, LLC, 369 NLRB No. 26 (Feb. 5, 2020). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:19 pm
Heaton (University of Pennsylvania Law School) has posted The Expansive Reach of Pretrial Detention (North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 98, Pg. 369, 2020) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:47 am
The National Labor Relations Board recently confirmed this in its Phillips 66 decision (369 NLRB No. 13). [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 11:16 am
In its January 31, 2020 decision in Phillips 66, 369 NLRB No. 13 (January 31, 2020) the Board reversed a number of findings of unfair labor practices found by an Administrative Law Judge related to the employer’s conduct during organizing and subsequent bargaining. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:33 pm
., 176 F.3d 369, 374 (6th Cir. 1999) (“Given the fact that the arbitration provision in the present case arises in a later contract, much more is needed to infer an intention to apply the provision to previous contracts. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:43 am
According to the Complaint, the insured driver lost control of his tractor-trailer while driving on Georgia Highway 369. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
S. 369 (2013), confirms that the presumption against fee shifting applies to all statutes—even those like §145 that do not explicitly award attorney’s fees to “prevailing parties. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:48 am
., 369 NLRB 1 (2019), the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) gave employers one final holiday gift by returning to its traditional standard for post-arbitral deferral. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 1:07 pm
Bandemer (19-369). [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:28 pm
Shamrock Foods Company, 369 N.L.R.B. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369 and its holding that CEQA is concerned with project impacts on environment, not the impacts of the existing environment on the project Holden v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:47 am
., 369 NLRB 1 (2019). [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 8:54 am
., 369 NLRB No. 1 (UPS), which announced a return to the decades-old standard for deferring to arbitral decisions in unfair labor practice cases alleging discharge or discipline in violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:48 am
Katz, 369 U.S. 736, the Supreme Court held that this statutory duty requires an employer to refrain from unilaterally changing most working conditions while bargaining over a new CBA is ongoing unless, the parties are at a bargaining impasse. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
., B-409722.9, Apr. 24, 2015 even though the amendment included agency answers to 369 offeror questions because, despite the sheer number of questions, the answers “did not revise solicitation terms and several questions were repetitious. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:55 pm
Young, 369 N.C. 118 (2016) (concluding that G.S. 15A-1380.5 “guarantees no hearing, no notice, and no procedural rights,” and that the law therefore was not a “meaningful review” within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
