Posts tagged with: "74" Results 9301 - 9320 of 11,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am by Paul Adam
  Here, assuming that Eric’s testamentary bequest had been facially repugnant in the sense that it disinherited Verolin for expressly stated discriminatory reasons, the bequest would nonetheless be valid as reflecting a testator’s intentional, private disposition of his property – the core aspect of testamentary freedom.[74]      In these hypothetical circumstances, neither Ontario’s Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
After a military judge “sitting as a general court-martial convicted [him] of two specifications of knowingly possessing . . . 224 obscene visual depictions of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Mark A. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:11 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
It may be true that the normatively rich ideal of the rule of law includes a presumption that changes in the legal system are to be brought about by actions that are compatible with existing legal rules; but this cannot be an absolute requirement. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:07 pm by Howard Knopf
   As Justice John Evans, the  dean of administrative law in Canada, stated in the judicial review decision:[74] In the absence of a request from experienced counsel acting for a sophisticated client, fairness did not, in the circumstances of this case, require the Board to disclose copies of the SOCAN agreements on its own motion. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th.You can see a draft here, but here's the Introduction: Speech compulsions, the Court has often held, are as constitutionally suspect as are speech restrictions: "[T]he First Amendment guarantees 'freedom of speech,' a term necessarily comprising the decision of both what to say and what not to say. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:58 am by Gustavo Arballo
Habla de las obligaciones de trabajo, con pautas de diligencia ("procurar que los procesos a su cargo se resuelvan en un plazo razonable", 74; "no contraer obligaciones que perturben o impidan el cumplimiento apropiado de sus funciones específicas", 77), y contraculturalmente, dice que "el juez debe tener una actitud positiva hacia los sistemas de evaluación  de su desempeño" (78) En eso último está la clave de todo. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
In such circumstances, the pardon is granted not to temper the criminal law or to reconcile political dissidents, as envisioned by the Framers—see, for example, Federalist 74 and remarks by Edmund Randolph at the Philadelphia Convention—but to execute an intrigue by which the law is thwarted. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
President Trump on Thursday, May 28, signed an executive order targetting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that provides tech companies from being held liable for third-party content shared on their sites. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> President's Weekly Address: Climate Change Can No Longer Be Ignored - In this week's address, the President spoke about his commitment to combatting the threat of climate change and to keeping ourselves and future generations safe. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
 Pix Credit here This announcement from the folks at the  Global Reporting Initiative (GRI):A global public comment period is now underway to gather input on the exposure draft of the revised Biodiversity Standard. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Occasionally we see plaintiff-side experts attempt to opine, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty (or sometimes probability), that one of our clients’ products was a substantial factor – not in “causing” the purported injury, but in “increasing the risk” of that injury occurring. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:16 am by Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk
Editor’s Note: This piece is adapted from the author’s forthcoming law review article on central bank immunity. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:20 am
 Pix credit here Verfssungsblog recently published a most useful "explainer" on the 'Hong Kong 47 'verdicts. [read post]