Posts tagged with: "86"
Results 341 - 360
of 10,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
FOIL is applicable to "agency" records, but its definition of "agency" expressly excludes the "judiciary" (Public Officers Law § 86[3]). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
FOIL is applicable to "agency" records, but its definition of "agency" expressly excludes the "judiciary" (Public Officers Law § 86[3]). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:51 pm
VBGDC 86/55 RD, reduced to speeding at 20 over. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 7:51 pm
VBGDC 86/55 RD, reduced to speeding at 20 over. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Vol. 3, 685-86, In re Tesla, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:26 am
Currently, almost 500 externally-funded studies with budgets totaling $86 million are underway at the Institute, many of them supported by the federal government. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 6:42 am
He takes us first back to the word (Broekman, supra, pp. 84-86. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 2:08 am
In fact, a recent survey found that 86 percent of employees feel there are groups that are underrepresented in their workplaces. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 2:08 am
In fact, a recent survey found that 86 percent of employees feel there are groups that are underrepresented in their workplaces. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 6:09 pm
In Illinois, 86 percent of all drivers arrested for DUI are first-time offenders. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Most Common Pre-Employment Checks The most common checks conducted by our survey respondents from North America are criminal record checks (86%), Social Security Number (SSN) verification (69%), employment verifications (54%), drug and/or alcohol testing (52%), and Sex Offender Registry checks (47%). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
Requirements Related to Surprise Billing: Part II, 86 Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:04 am
Additional Findings Additional findings related to social media use at work from this study include: Half (50%) of workers prefer that their employers not follow them on social media so they can avoid mixing their personal and professional lives; 22% are actually afraid of their employers finding their personal social media accounts.The majority (86%) of workers who are afraid of their employers finding their personal accounts are afraid they will be judged for what… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
Authors: Steven Cernak and Luis Blanquez As we explained in a prior post, the new draft merger Guidelines issued recently by the FTC and DOJ cite to several older court opinions that may be unfamiliar to antitrust practitioners who have been focused for decades exclusively on earlier versions of the Guidelines. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:58 am
About a decade ago, I gave a speech on software outsourcing at a major software event. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:19 pm
” Indeed, the report found that “more than 86% of women in California (compared with 81% nationally) and 53% of men (compared with 43% nationally) report having experienced some form of sexual harassment or assault in their lifetime. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:19 am
DASCA expanded the definition of “anabolic steroid” to include a drug or hormonal substance chemically and pharmacologically related to testosterone (other than estrogens, progestins, corticosteroids and dehydroepiandrosterone) that brings to 86 substances now listed in 21 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
Many actual sellers (convenience sample) make effectiveness claims—80% almost always/half the time; 85% make testimonial claims; 73% make data-based claims (lose 1.8 pounds/week); 86% make positive subjective claims; 78% make business opportunity claims. 59% were aware that laws/rules constrain the claims they make, mostly made aware by training or other reps from company. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
In Ingmar, the CJEU had decided that a commercial agent’s compensation claim according to Arts. 17 and 18 of the Commercial Agents Directive (86/653/EEC) could not be avoided through a choice of law in favour of the law of a non-EU country, even though the Directive said nothing about an internationally mandatory nature for the purpose of private international law – as Art. 22 (5) CSDDD in contrast now does. [read post]
