Posts tagged with: "Adsense" Results 101 - 120 of 510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 4:25 pm by Eric
Nevertheless, these lists may not be comprehensive (they have weasel words in the intro, and the academics list doesn't include competitively allocated research grants). 3) AdSense publishers (one of the disclosure categories I harped on--fortunately I wasn't on the list!) [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm by Venkat
As Venkat indicates, we should be on the list, but I'm skeptical that my pathetic AdSense earnings have affected my analysis. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:23 am by David Kravets
Google said it used the backdoor so that it could place +1 buttons on ads it places around the web via its Adsense program, so that logged-in Google+ users could press the button to share an ad. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
And for good reason: notable 20 percent projects include GMail, Google News, Google Talk, and AdSense. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:01 am by Chris Castle
And of course Lyrics007 (with the slogan “We Do Better than James Bond” which itself is a trademark infringement) is a Google Adsense publisher: All part of the Olympic spirit, yes? [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:34 am by Joe Sanders
Google AdSense has temporarily disabled our account, so in order to clean up the blog so it's "child friendly" we are going to go through the posts and remove anything that may be violent or adult related. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm by Joe Sanders
Well it appears that someone complained to Google AdSense about our blog and the ads we had here, so Google has suspended our account. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:31 am by tekEditor
In 2010, Philip says that Google closed down his Adsense account, kept several months of earnings, and then ignored letters sent to the company by his lawyer. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:03 am by Eric
The latter fact should be entirely irrelevant for Section 230 purposes, and it's almost certainly not true as a factual matter if PissedConsumer is a Google AdSense publisher. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm by tekEditor
Cameron Marlow calls himself Facebook's "in-house sociologist. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:38 am by Chris Castle
  And has Adsense Publisher ID: pub-0919305250342516.” In order for the site to publish advertising, the site must have a deal with an adserving company. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:30 pm by tekEditor
First time accepted submitter WindyWonka writes "Google and AOL were sued for patent infringement Thursday, accused of violating two former British Telecom patents via Google's search 'snippets' and by Google AdSense and Advertising.com ad serving technology. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
“Your Horses Seem to be Winning”: The European Commission’s Antitrust Case Against Google Matters to Artists and Songwriters — Chris Castle notes: “For artists, these cases are important because the central theme boils down to this:  If Google just offered search and sold its Adwords and Adsense products, the fact that the company had achieved at least a dominant position if not a monopoly over search on the Internet would not necessarily be bad. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:37 am by Chris Castle
For artists, these cases are important because the central theme boils down to this:  If Google just offered search and sold its Adwords and Adsense products, the fact that the company had achieved at least a dominant position if not a monopoly over search on the Internet would not necessarily be bad. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:52 pm
Blogs listed below may be "IPKat-approved", which does not mean that the IPKat actually approves of their content but that (i) this Kat provides some technical and logistical assistance as well as content and that (ii) the blogs do not carry paid-for advertising, pop-ups, banners, small ads via Adsense and so on. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:34 am by Ryan Singel
There was a profile here, but it was based on inferences made based solely on the pages that you visited that were running AdSense (now known as DoubleClick). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm by Jonathan Bailey
What that means is that, when the image is placed on Pinterest, the image is attributed back to WhatToPin.com and not the source of the image, as shown above.When it comes to getting pins, WhatToPin.com has been very successful, with many of its posts getting thousands of pins, all using work taken from another sites.WhatToPin.com then turns at least some of this traffic into revenue via Google Adsense ads sprinkled throughout the site.Clearly this gives artists a great deal to worry about.… [read post]