Posts tagged with: "Appeals" Results 961 - 980 of 353,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2024, 1:58 am by Stephen Page
Judges of the Queensland Court of Appeal had this to say: “It is possible that a person with the attribute of lesbian sexual activity generally has the characteristic of being exclusively lesbian. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:58 am by Stephen Page
Judges of the Queensland Court of Appeal had this to say: “It is possible that a person with the attribute of lesbian sexual activity generally has the characteristic of being exclusively lesbian. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:02 am by Berniard Law Firm
While the CSC initially upheld his termination, the Court of Appeal disagreed, finding that the punishment was too severe for the offense. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:00 pm
MSN Labs, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, that later-filed, later-issued claims cannot serve as proper reference for invalidating earlier-filed, earlier-issued claims having the same priority date under obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), clarifying its decision in In re Cellect by explaining which reference claims can be considered proper for ODP analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:00 pm
MSN Labs, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, that later-filed, later-issued claims cannot serve as proper reference for invalidating earlier-filed, earlier-issued claims having the same priority date under obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), clarifying its decision in In re Cellect by explaining which reference claims can be considered proper for ODP analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:00 pm
MSN Labs, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, that later-filed, later-issued claims cannot serve as proper reference for invalidating earlier-filed, earlier-issued claims having the same priority date under obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), clarifying its decision in In re Cellect by explaining which reference claims can be considered proper for ODP analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:00 pm
MSN Labs, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, that later-filed, later-issued claims cannot serve as proper reference for invalidating earlier-filed, earlier-issued claims having the same priority date under obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), clarifying its decision in In re Cellect by explaining which reference claims can be considered proper for ODP analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:00 pm
MSN Labs, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, that later-filed, later-issued claims cannot serve as proper reference for invalidating earlier-filed, earlier-issued claims having the same priority date under obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), clarifying its decision in In re Cellect by explaining which reference claims can be considered proper for ODP analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:00 pm
MSN Labs, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held, that later-filed, later-issued claims cannot serve as proper reference for invalidating earlier-filed, earlier-issued claims having the same priority date under obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), clarifying its decision in In re Cellect by explaining which reference claims can be considered proper for ODP analysis. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 6:42 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  The deputy solicitor general, shockingly, responded that yes, they can be prosecuted, the Court of Appeals decision notwithstanding. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 pm
  Provoo was tried in the Southern District of New York, convicted, and sentenced to life imprisonment.Provoo’s lead counsel on appeal was George A. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 3:12 pm by Jack Bogdanski
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 12:54 pm by Georgialee Lang
While the appeal court noted that the chambers judge had failed to deal with this argument, it held that the lower court’s dismissal of Mr. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 12:37 pm by Howard Friedman
Nor does it contain a method to appeal the Commission’s determination or require that the Commission furnish justifications for its decisions with respect to applications for Special Events Permits. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 10:17 am by Eugene Volokh
The Ninth Circuit let the case proceed in 2021, but that decision dealt only with "the single element of their defamation claims at issue on this appeal—the of and concerning element" of libel law; as I noted then, The court doesn't deal with the separate question whether the label "murder" (1) should be seen as an opinion based on disclosed or widely known facts, much as saying "O.J. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Friday vacated and remanded a Colorado district court’s award of attorney’s fees to Sling T.V. and DISH Networks (DISH). [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Friday vacated and remanded a Colorado district court’s award of attorney’s fees to Sling T.V. and DISH Networks (DISH). [read post]
Both employers and union have stated they will comply with the unanimous decision, however, the union will seek an appeal to the Federal Court of Canada. [read post]